Health Care Solutions

October 24th, 2008 by admin

 

The Patient relation Management Solution was designed for bariatric and metabolic surgical practices. Whether your bariatric program is small, medium or large, PRM provides a comprehensive approach to tracking the patient flow from the initial contact to surgery and post follow-up care.

Patient relation Management software is neither a Practice Management System nor an  Electronic Medical Record software. It is a specifically  focused diseased state driven software to qualify a patient for treatment; simplify the process for scheduling a patient; tracking the patient flow; and reporting on the progress of treatment. Some of the potential benefits that will enable providers of bariatric and metabolic surgery devices and services are; efficient collection and reporting of accurate and long term data on the affects of surgery; communication of disease state reports through e-mail and other avenues to both referring and primary care physician; data collection that is a requirement of Center of Excellence eligibility.

Patient relation Management, LLC was launched in 2007 by a team of visionaries who realized that the healthcare industry needed IT solutions that leveraged the latest technology, addressed the increasing complexity of managing a bariatric program and generated real, tangible benefits to bariatric practices of all sizes. Working with healthcare advisors and physicians, the PRM development team spent many years turning the vision into reality. The result of the vision is Patient Relationship Management – a disease state driven software for bariatric and metabolic surgery. The goal of the disease state driven software is to work in tandem and leverage Practice Management Systems and Electronic Medical Record software capabilities of maintaining one electronic record per patient for all disease states. A real solution that streamlines operations, increases patient flow, and improves patient satisfaction.

LOCAL INSTALLATION

The Patient relation Management Solution is available in the ASP Model or a stand-alone model. With the ASP Model, the system is supported and maintained at a secured datacenter so you don’t need a dedicated IT staff and do not incur server/network infrastructure cost. With the Stand-Alone Model, you install, support, and maintain servers and data at your place of business. The Patient relation Management Solution provides bariatric practices with easy to use features including enter once data entry and a robust reporting mechanism. PRM starts where Practice Management System and Electronic Medical Record software stops and improves bariatric programs efficiency and virtually eliminates patient completing paperwork with a pen.

The synergy that PRM can provide to your bariatric program can be very lucrative and productive to your entire business model.

Source

www.PatientRelationship.net

Posted in Public health | No Comments »

Electronic Medical Record Services: Should You Make The Change? Article - Health Articles

October 22nd, 2008 by admin

Despite the fact that electronic medical record programs and services are in demand, many have remained skeptical about them. But an article on the American Academy of Family Practice has shown that it may be a feasible option. The piece addresses all queries and hesitations on the efficiency of the service and the systems themselves.

First, the battle is between using the usual paper and file based medical records and using an electronic medical record software method that turns everything digital. Many may wonder, if it isn’t broken why fix it? But with the rising patient numbers, any product that would lessen the health care professionals’ time handling papers and increase patient visits is a good thing.

The promise of technology with an electronic medical record service is the capacity to quickly and easily obtain patient records from virtually anywhere and quickly and accurately make correct diagnosis.

Skepticism involved questions on the software’s accuracy with records, operational costs, and difficulty of use. Some are skeptical about giving their patients’ private history under the care of an electronic medical record company. We list the issues raised here:

- A doctor can still be efficient even without these electronic record keeping products.

- The price may be too high.

- It might not be HIPPA regulated.

- It might be too difficult to understand and would only waste very important time.

- What will become of the physical records if the transition to computerized form happens?

- There are so many electronic record service providers to choose from.

Electronic medical record programs will at first have a high cost to them without doubt. Money is recovered via the increase in patient care, reductions in paperwork and associated costs for equipment, supplies and staffing and in centralizing information and data and health records. Compare it with medical transcription, which costs as high as $25,000 and you’ll notice the difference.

HIPPA compliance concerns are also not a setback, as electronic medical record packages all meet HIPPA standards. As regards ease of operation, while it could take time to learn, it’s really not difficult to master, given a very user-friendly interface. Customer hotlines are even available at all times for all concerns and queries.

Using an electronic medical record service has also been proven to tack on some minutes to each patient consultation and even allows real-time updating. Some opt to store their records for a year first, before turning over to electronic records firms.

Regarding the specific program that the physician should use, it really depends on the purpose. Shopping around and reading articles and reviews about the programs in the market first will allow you to bag the most appropriate suite.

Posted in Public health | No Comments »

Medical Transcription Advantages And Disadvantages Article - Health Articles

October 20th, 2008 by admin

Advantages

Corresponds intuitively to the physician’s usual method of working. Dictation remains the most intuitive and least time-consuming means of data entry.

Physicians can dictate anytime, anywhere using PDA, Dictaphone or telephone at their convenience.

Providers need not change the way they practice just to accommodate an EMR. EMR can interact with transcription service so that transcriptions can be attached directly into the patient’s electronic medical record, if such a facility is provided by the EMR vendor.

Provides expressive power to describe patient’s condition and other health related events

Disadvantages

Details of the exam can easily be forgotten and omitted while dictating, if dictation is not captured immediately at the point of care

It cannot be queried for generating reports unless transcribed in pre-formatted templates

Transcribed reports are not immediately accessible. Physicians would normally have to wait for 12 to 24 hours for charts to be delivered, unless few vendors supporting 2-4 hours short turn around time.

Transcription provides for more efficient use of doctor’s time.

Although average transcribed report costs $2 to $4, it can reduce the doctor’s time spent on data entry. Considering the value of doctor’s time, transcription is not a costly proposition.

EMR should give the freedom to the physician to decide to use either Point %26 Click or Medical Transcription. For a physician, the EMR that fits into his practice workflow would be invaluable. A competent EMR must have a template driven charting feature and the ability to interact with a transcription service at the same time. Both are indispensable features of Electronic Medical Record Software, as doctors are not unanimous on point and click charting or transcription. Such an EMR will be both efficient and cost effective.

The trends in transcription itself are changing with Medical Transcription service providers aiming to adopt new technologies. These technologies will evolve to increase efficiency %26 accuracy, decrease turnaround time and support data capture. While many of these technologies like such as digital dictation and electronic signature exist today, several technologies are still on the horizon.

Posted in Public health | No Comments »

How Purchasing Electronic Medical Record Software Can Be Advantageous To You Article - Health Articles

October 19th, 2008 by admin

Your medical practice can greatly gain from the appropriate kind of electronic medical record software. Electronic medical records software is quickly taking the place of paper documents these days.

Electronic Medical Record Software Advantages:

- The efficiency of your practice improves. This is because the data is easier to maintain.

- Time consuming and long paperwork that add to your overhead expenses will be eliminated.

- No paperwork represents less space required to save and store your documents.

- When you use EMR software, data is easily accessible.

- Users are provided with password access so the data is secured and confidentiality is maintained. There’s less danger of unauthorized users gaining access to data as opposed to paperwork documentation. History of who accessed and edited data is also on hand.

- Data is backed up 3-4 times each day and a duplicate of it is also saved in an off-site facility.

- Physicians can go into patient records fast so they can be better cared for.

- Electronic prescriptions lessen mistakes that pharmacists may make because of the illegible handwriting of the physician.

- Electronic medical record software also means huge savings on the cost of transcription.

- You may be provided with a discount on your malpractice insurance if you have reliable EMR software installed.

- Time is saved by allowing multiple user access to records.

- Remote access to the data is given.

- You can improve your practice’s administration by analying the trends.

- They can be easily integrated with other databases and systems and are also easy to use and install.

EMR software is truly a worthwhile investment as it improves efficiency in administration to provide enhanced patient care. This depends on your selection of vendor, though. Find an established vendor with an excellent track record. Your provider must be able to give adequate support and good customer service and must be able to conduct on-site or web-based training. As long as it complies with HL7 or HIPAA requirements, you can go for either the cheaper web-based service or a full scale software package.

You should be sure that the product is just how you want it. Know all the fees associated with the EMR software. Know if upgrades are free or at least, discounted. For better integration, buy a medical practice management software from the same firm, or find a product that can do both.

Posted in Public health | No Comments »

Medical Transcription Advantages And Disadvantages Article - Health Articles

October 17th, 2008 by admin

Advantages

Corresponds intuitively to the physician’s usual method of working. Dictation remains the most intuitive and least time-consuming means of data entry.

Physicians can dictate anytime, anywhere using PDA, Dictaphone or telephone at their convenience.

Providers need not change the way they practice just to accommodate an EMR. EMR can interact with transcription service so that transcriptions can be attached directly into the patient’s electronic medical record, if such a facility is provided by the EMR vendor.

Provides expressive power to describe patient’s condition and other health related events

Disadvantages

Details of the exam can easily be forgotten and omitted while dictating, if dictation is not captured immediately at the point of care

It cannot be queried for generating reports unless transcribed in pre-formatted templates

Transcribed reports are not immediately accessible. Physicians would normally have to wait for 12 to 24 hours for charts to be delivered, unless few vendors supporting 2-4 hours short turn around time.

Transcription provides for more efficient use of doctor’s time.

Although average transcribed report costs $2 to $4, it can reduce the doctor’s time spent on data entry. Considering the value of doctor’s time, transcription is not a costly proposition.

EMR should give the freedom to the physician to decide to use either Point %26 Click or Medical Transcription. For a physician, the EMR that fits into his practice workflow would be invaluable. A competent EMR must have a template driven charting feature and the ability to interact with a transcription service at the same time. Both are indispensable features of Electronic Medical Record Software, as doctors are not unanimous on point and click charting or transcription. Such an EMR will be both efficient and cost effective.

The trends in transcription itself are changing with Medical Transcription service providers aiming to adopt new technologies. These technologies will evolve to increase efficiency %26 accuracy, decrease turnaround time and support data capture. While many of these technologies like such as digital dictation and electronic signature exist today, several technologies are still on the horizon.

Posted in Public health | No Comments »

 
© 2010 Maintain a healthy Brought by www.healthordisease.com - Designed by: djf 2008.5 tattoos